Biopharma industry urges agency to open the door wider to use of non-randomized observational studies to support efficacy claims, but insurer Kaiser Permanente calls such studies problematic.
The US Food and Drug Administration should take a more welcoming view on the use of observational studies to support new efficacy claims for approved drugs, the pharmaceutical industry believes.
Concerns about bias and the lack of randomization in observational studies need not derail the use of such real-world evidence...
Exploring How Everyday Industrial Compounds Enter Our Systems, Their Health Implications, and the Ongoing Quest for Safer Alternatives .
With the deadline for comments on the US FDA’s draft guidance less than a month away, the Pink Sheet offers an infographic outlining what the agency is expecting in diversity action plans and when that might be implemented.
The agency also should explain the potential consequences for sponsors if enrollment goals are not met, stakeholders say in comments on the DAP draft guidance. Some commenters urged the FDA to apply waiver criteria flexibly, especially for rare diseases.
The US FDA commissioner also said the hub is looking for an executive director who will work with the CBER and CDER heads, who will serve as co-leads.
Brazil has also published its recent regulatory reliance regulations in English, a move designed to increase confidence in its decisions as it presses on with aligning its national practices with global best practices.
The US FDA commissioner also said the hub is looking for an executive director who will work with the CBER and CDER heads, who will serve as co-leads.
The FDA and sponsors of two new accelerated approval drugs for PBC have taken steps in study design, initiation and reporting transparency to ensure timely completion; Intercept’s COBALT trial of obeticholic acid was negatively impacted by product safety labeling changes and a high crossover rate to commercial drug.
