Biotech sponsors understandably discuss accelerated approval as an important consideration in development plans. But the head of the US FDA oncology program has a reminder for them: the pathway is intended to serve patients – not drug companies.
The US Food & Drug Administration oncology drug review team is getting a lot of attention for cleaning up accelerate approval indications after confirmatory studies fail.
But the agency is also drawing some lines in the sand when it comes to granting Accelerated Approval in the...
Exploring How Everyday Industrial Compounds Enter Our Systems, Their Health Implications, and the Ongoing Quest for Safer Alternatives .
With the deadline for comments on the US FDA’s draft guidance less than a month away, the Pink Sheet offers an infographic outlining what the agency is expecting in diversity action plans and when that might be implemented.
The agency also should explain the potential consequences for sponsors if enrollment goals are not met, stakeholders say in comments on the DAP draft guidance. Some commenters urged the FDA to apply waiver criteria flexibly, especially for rare diseases.
The US FDA commissioner also said the hub is looking for an executive director who will work with the CBER and CDER heads, who will serve as co-leads.
Brazil has also published its recent regulatory reliance regulations in English, a move designed to increase confidence in its decisions as it presses on with aligning its national practices with global best practices.
The US FDA commissioner also said the hub is looking for an executive director who will work with the CBER and CDER heads, who will serve as co-leads.
The FDA and sponsors of two new accelerated approval drugs for PBC have taken steps in study design, initiation and reporting transparency to ensure timely completion; Intercept’s COBALT trial of obeticholic acid was negatively impacted by product safety labeling changes and a high crossover rate to commercial drug.
